Hi, I’m just wondering, since the halo has a powerful battery (which will itself have an energetic field that could affect our bodies) whether it could be harmful to have the device next to your body for long periods for this reason. Is it better to keep it at a little distance from the body rather than against the skin?
4 Likes
Batteries do not cause any harm. They have been used for years in hearing aids, pacemakers and cell phones which, most people, carry in their pockets. It is the devices that may cause harm, nothing proven though.
This device (Halo) produces healing effect, quite the opposite of harm.
2 Likes
Thanks for your response 
It is not the battery itself I am concerned about, but the electromagnetic field that it inevitably emits and the interference of having this close to the body. I personally avoid keeping a mobile phone in my pocket.
There is plenty of research to suggest that long term exposure to electro magnetic fields (from power lines, electric vehicles, etc) can potentially impact the health of the body, which is why devices like AHA Halo are being designed, to emit positive EMF. But, unlike the Spooky 2 and other devices, the Halo requires being close to the battery at the same time. Hence my question.
1 Like
AS a precaution you may like to use a Shungite or Organite device.
When we buy new batteries my pendulum rotates anti clockwise. A few minutes with Shungite the pendulum rotates clockwise. It is my understanding that battery life may also be increased using this method. Naturally our mobile phone does the same. You may wish to research the benefits of Shungite. It is possible using the Bovis Scale to measure the energy of healing devices and I shall be doing this when Halo arrives.
6 Likes
John White has shared that the device is pure scalar transmissive and that it produces no (or very minimal) EMFs. Within this scalar field, the EMFs do not harm our cells as they pass through - thus the protection.
7 Likes
Hi Curlew 100, TQ for the above reply. Would you text us your result using the Bovis Scale to measure the AHA Halo. Appreciate it very much
Im Video wurde erklärt, daß der Halo eine sehr sehr geringe EMF Strahlung hat. Das Spooyk2 Scalargerät hat eine stärkere EMF Strahlung, deshalb die Abstände zum Kopf usw. sollten eingehalten werden. Dann bekommt man auch keine EMF Strahlung ab, sondern nur die Heilsame Energie.
2 Likes
I shall be glad to. 
3 Likes
Curlew 100,
Thank you very much for your support and cooperation.
1 Like
Hello Eric. The device has finally arrived. I intend to start a new topic “first impressions”.
In this I will comment on the energy using my pendulum and the Bovis Biometer.
3 Likes
As an aside, I give my houseplants shungite infused water and they absolutely love it!
Cool,
looking forward to your comment soon and have a great day
While I basically agree that technical EMFs are usually not on the beneficial side, I’d like to draw your attention to your own examples using either high voltage or alternating currents, which a battery does not. Its direct current will not produce an EMF wave like an alternating current.
Perhaps these were not the best examples then..!
Still, I’m not sure what your point is since batteries do of course emit EMF radiation, the field of which is easily measurable using a good quality emf reader.
I acknowledge that the field of the halo’s battery will of course be minimal given its small size, but since it is advised that the device be worn against the body in the shoulder bag, its impact is worthy of consideration.
2 Likes
Hope the management/invertor will clarify this battery situation
Hat das mal einer gemessen? Vergleichen mit Handystrahlung?
This topic arose during an online presentation of halo. A participant claimed that muscle‑testing had revealed an EMF, but the following scientific facts show otherwise.
A chemical cell delivers a static electromotive force (EMF = voltage) only when it is disconnected. The resulting electric field is confined to the space between the two terminals inside the casing plus a few millimetres of air gap, and, because nothing in the battery is switching or oscillating, the cell emits no RF energy.
Modern broadband survey meters (e.g., the Narda ELT‑400 and the Aaronia Spectran HF‑60100 V4) register only noise‑floor readings when placed next to an idle battery.
halo device employs a two‑layer, double‑power‑plane PCB that routes the forward and return paths directly above one another, minimising loop area. At a distance of 1 cm, halo’s magnetic flux density is less than 1 % of the geomagnetic field and less than 0.02 % of that produced by a refrigerator magnet.
Most consumer EMF detectors (Gaussmeters, inductive pickup probes, TriField meters) use Hall sensors or inductive coils and respond only to time‑varying fields; they read zero when presented with halo’s static condition.
Halo also incorporates a self‑cancelling coil topology: each layer carries equal and opposite current vectors separated by less than 0.05 mm. This near‑zero dipole moment further suppresses the external B‑field, while the reduced internal inductance improves transient immunity without increasing emissions.
Field mapping with a three‑axis fluxgate probe (< 50 nT resolution) shows readings at the noise floor - several orders of magnitude below common ELF safety guidelines (200 µT continuous public exposure, IEEE C95.6‑2002).
From an electromagnetic‑exposure standpoint, standing next to halo is demonstrably safer than standing near many commonplace household items, including a simple fridge magnet.
Regards,
John White
11 Likes
Thank you. This is very reassuring🙏
1 Like
This puts out next to nothing. .5 Milligauss. I have tested on two different EMF Meters. You’re getting more than just about anywhere in house/apartment unless you stand in the middle of a room away from everything electric.
4 Likes
