Hello, Penny.
Thank you so very much for your kind reply. I do greatly appreciate it.
I understand the idea about observing one’s bodily reactions and adjusting Aha Halo use accordingly. I have done so in the past.
However, this kind of guidance does not directly address the inherent risk factor pointed out explicitly by the user who posted the above comments. If there is some hard constraint as to the maximum duration one can safely use Aha Halo for, I think this would be most important for all device users to know. The guidance to date has been that some programs could be run for shorter period of times, and some other programs for chronic issues, for longer periods of time (i.e., days, weeks).
I am also concerned that I may not be able to assess in a timely fashion any potential detrimental impact from running a program in time to stop running it and thus prevent any “damage” to body. For example, I have been running Cell program for weeks, with no visible side effects. But if what the user who commented above on the inherent risk of using Aha Halo for longer period of time is indeed correct, then perhaps some negative side effects might still develop within my body; but I would not be aware of this due to not having an immediate negative reaction?
I would be most tremendously indebted if Mr. White, at his convenience, might be so kind as to comment on these specific comments made by the user above – and directly address any potential risk around usage of Aha Halo the user claims exists due to:
-
“The Aha Halo is a scalar transmitter. Here the physical body acts as a receiver.”
-
“Dr. Konstantin Meyl of Germany - a world pioneer in scalar science - has warned not to use a single scalar transmitter with the body acting as a receiver, unless for short periods (or less ?).”
I have also posted in the other thread:
Thank you!
CKB